Daniel, Joey, On Thu, 2022-01-27 at 16:43 -0500, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: > -------- > ### Substantive changes from -01 to -02 > > - Clarify that deployment to a pool does not need to be strictly simultaneous > - Explain why authoritatives need to serve the same records regardless of SNI > - Defer to external, protocol-specific references for resource management > - Clarify that probed connections must not fail due to authentication failure > --------
Thank you for this, this document is evolving very nicely. Speaking only for myself: some of the parts still seem too prescriptive to me (but I know I haven't been clear on what parts!). Examples: 4.3.1 seems too focused on some specific load balancer implementations, and causes a terrible combinatorial state explosion. 4.5 could perhaps use some words along the lines of "we describe an algorithm here; you could use another algorithm if it fits your implementation better, as long as it has similar outcomes". I do like that it mentions happy eyeballs without prescribing them. Speaking for both myself and Paul Hoffman: we are happier with your document than with our currently adopted work. We strongly suggest that the WG adopts unilateral-probing so we can work out what it would take to get some implementation work going. Kind regards, -- Peter van Dijk PowerDNS.COM BV - https://www.powerdns.com/ _______________________________________________ dns-privacy mailing list dns-privacy@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy
