I have entered issues in our repo for all the reviews by IESG members.
Ben Kaduk submitted an editorial PR, and it was accepted.
There is another PR being processed to address the clarification on
usage of 0RTT required by Ben and Lars --
https://github.com/huitema/dnsoquic/pull/158. Please review.
I will start another PR addressing Francesca and Alvaro's point.
After that, we may need an editorial pass for the other comments.
The goal should be to have a draft ready when the publishing window reopens.
-- Christian Huitema
On 3/15/2022 8:59 AM, Eric Vyncke (evyncke) wrote:
Dear authors,
The revised I-D should mainly address Francesca Palombini's 2nd COMMENT point
(which was also raised by Alvaro Retana). Both of them told me that they were
about to raise a blocking DISCUSS on this specific point, so let's address is.
It is mainly about either changing a SHOULD into a MUST or explaining when the
SHOULD can be ignored.
Of course, addressing the other points would improve the quality of the
documents.
Once a revised I-D addressing Francesca's point, I am approving the document
and sending it to the RFC Editor.
Regards
-éric
-----Original Message-----
From: IETF Secretariat <[email protected]>
Date: Thursday, 10 March 2022 at 16:21
To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>, "[email protected]" <[email protected]>,
"[email protected]" <[email protected]>, "[email protected]"
<[email protected]>, Eric Vyncke <[email protected]>
Subject: Datatracker State Update Notice: <draft-ietf-dprive-dnsoquic-10.txt>
IESG state changed:
New State: Approved-announcement to be sent::Revised I-D Needed
(The previous state was IESG Evaluation)
Datatracker URL:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dprive-dnsoquic/
_______________________________________________
dns-privacy mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy
