On Mar 17, 2022, at 10:30 AM, Tim Wicinski <[email protected]> wrote: > > I've the updated agenda > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/113/materials/agenda-113-dprive-03.md
That agenda seems wrong in a few ways; maybe it could be updated? First, it has the name of the WG's primary document wrong; that should be draft-ietf-dprive-unilateral-probing. Second, it still lists draft-ietf-dprive-unauth-to-authoritative as a WG document, even though that has been withdrawn. Third, it asks "is the WG completed all tasks?" when it clearly has not because we have just started WG discussion of draft-ietf-dprive-unilateral-probing. A different agenda for DPRIVE would would be a quick review of the IESG status of draft-ietf-dprive-dnsoquic, followed by 45 minutes for draft-ietf-dprive-unilateral-probing. The latter discussion could lead to a concrete plan to deal with issues in a timely manner so that the WG can keep focus and we can move that document on the IETF review. This still gives the ADD WG more than the 45 minutes of drafts discussion for their group in their current agenda. --Paul Hoffman
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ dns-privacy mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy
