> On 25 Mar 2022, at 07:46, Alexander Mayrhofer <[email protected]> > wrote: > > All, > > as mentioned in DPRIVE yesterday, > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc8467 describes an > (experimental) padding policy that was based on measurements performed > by Daniel, and presented at NDSS in 2017. > > Unfortunately, the original link to the paper doesn't work anymore: > https://dns.cmrg.net/ndss2017-dprive-empirical-DNS-traffic-size.pdf > > Future measurements could base on that work. Also, those future > measurements would probably lead to more insight regarding appropriate > padding sizes, so we could update RFC 8467.
Hi All, A late follow up but there is also a minor outstanding task to work on padding for Zone transfer over TLS. > > Daniel, do you still have the paper from the link mentioned above? > (The paper does not seem to be available but for reference a set of slides presented on this work at NDSS 2017 are here: https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B5gNT4RRJ0xPWTNfanYtUFU1bHc/view?resourcekey=0-mo33xmSnmfgc9N412adgvQ) This topic came up in response to a question about future work for DPRIVE - just to mention that I’m aware of hackathon work and a WIP draft (not yet published) on the topic of encrypting Dynamic Updates that would potentially be new work for the WG. Best regards Sara. _______________________________________________ dns-privacy mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy
