Hi Amanda, Thank you for the change - looks good. And the proposed text update makes sense too.
Many thanks Sara. > On 11 Apr 2022, at 19:05, Amanda Baber via RT <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Hi all, > > We've removed RFC 8094 from the reference field for the tcp port: > > https://www.iana.org/assignments/service-names-port-numbers/service-names-port-numbers.xhtml?search=domain-s > > It might be appropriate to make a change like this to the IANA Considerations > section: > > OLD: > > Additionally, IANA is requested to update the Description field for > the corresponding TCP port 853 allocation to be 'DNS query-response > protocol run over TLS' for consistency and clarity. > > NEW: > > Additionally, IANA is requested to update the Description field for > the corresponding TCP port 853 allocation to be 'DNS query-response > protocol run over TLS' for consistency and clarity and to remove > RFC 8094 from the TCP allocation's Reference field. > > I'll tell the RFC Editor the actions are complete. > > thanks, > Amanda > > On Mon Apr 11 14:57:46 2022, [email protected] wrote: >> Yes: DoT for the TCP port and QUIC/DTLS for the UDP port. >> >> On Mon, Apr 11, 2022 at 6:39 AM Sara Dickinson <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> Just to clarify the request is remove the RFC8094 reference against >>> the >>> TCP port assignment (because the description was modified to remove >>> DTLS >>> from this port description). DNS-over-DTLS would remain listed >>> against the >>> UDP port assignment as previously agreed, and as listed below. >>> >>> Sara. >>> >>>> On 11 Apr 2022, at 14:15, Eric Vyncke (evyncke) <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>>> >>>> Let me loop in the TSV Area Directors as they may share my view >>>> that >>> DNS-over-DTLS should be kept in the IANA registry >>>> >>>> -éric >>>> >>>> >>>> -----Original Message----- >>>> From: Sara Dickinson <[email protected]> >>>> Date: Saturday, 9 April 2022 at 17:47 >>>> To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> >>>> Cc: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>, >>>> "[email protected]" < >>> [email protected]>, Eric Vyncke <[email protected]>, Erik Kline < >>> [email protected]>, "[email protected]" <[email protected]>, " >>> [email protected]" <[email protected]>, " >>> [email protected]" <[email protected]> >>>> Subject: Re: [IANA #1228441] Protocol Action: 'DNS over Dedicated >>>> QUIC >>> Connections' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-dprive-dnsoquic-11.txt) >>>> >>>> Hi Amanda, >>>> >>>> Thank you - all the changes look correct but we have one minor >>> request. >>>> >>>> Given that DNS-over-DTLS has been removed from the port 853 TCP >>>> entry >>> ‘description' field, it seems correct to also remove the reference to >>> RFC8094 from the ‘reference’ field for consistency. Could that change >>> please be made? >>>> >>>> Best regards >>>> >>>> Sara. >>>> >>>>>> Service Name: domain-s >>>>>> Port Number: 853 >>>>>> Transport Protocol: tcp >>>>>> Description: DNS query-response protocol run over TLS >>>>>> Assignee: [IESG] >>>>>> Contact: [IETF Chair] >>>>>> Registration Date: 2015-10-08 >>>>>> Modification Date: 2022-04-01 >>>>>> Reference: [RFC7858][RFC8094] >>>> >>>>> On 8 Apr 2022, at 20:34, Amanda Baber via RT <drafts- >>>>> [email protected]> >>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Dear Authors, >>>>> >>>>> This is a reminder that we need a reply to the message below. >>>>> >>>>> Best regards, >>>>> >>>>> Amanda Baber >>>>> IANA Operations Manager >>>>> >>>>> On Sat Apr 02 01:06:51 2022, amanda.baber wrote: >>>>>> Dear Authors: >>>>>> >>>>>> ATTENTION: A RESPONSE TO THIS MESSAGE IS NEEDED >>>>>> >>>>>> We've completed the registry actions for the following RFC-to-be: >>>>>> >>>>>> draft-ietf-dprive-dnsoquic-11 >>>>>> >>>>>> ACTION 1: >>>>>> >>>>>> The following entry has been added to the TLS Application-Layer >>>>>> Protocol Negotiation (ALPN) Protocol IDs registry: >>>>>> >>>>>> DoQ 0x64 0x6F 0x71 ("doq") [RFC-ietf-dprive-dnsoquic-11] >>>>>> >>>>>> Please see >>>>>> https://www.iana.org/assignments/tls-extensiontype-values >>>>>> >>>>>> ACTION 2: >>>>>> >>>>>> An additional reference and an updated description have been >>>>>> listed >>>>>> for UDP port 853, and the word "DTLS" has been removed from the >>>>>> description of the corresponding TCP port. These two >>>>>> registrations now >>>>>> read as follows: >>>>>> >>>>>> Service Name: domain-s >>>>>> Port Number: 853 >>>>>> Transport Protocol: tcp >>>>>> Description: DNS query-response protocol run over TLS >>>>>> Assignee: [IESG] >>>>>> Contact: [IETF Chair] >>>>>> Registration Date: 2015-10-08 >>>>>> Modification Date: 2022-04-01 >>>>>> Reference: [RFC7858][RFC8094] >>>>>> >>>>>> Service Name: domain-s >>>>>> Port Number: 853 >>>>>> Transport Protocol: udp >>>>>> Description: DNS query-response protocol run over DTLS or QUIC >>>>>> Assignee: [IESG] >>>>>> Contact: [IETF Chair] >>>>>> Registration Date: 2015-10-08 >>>>>> Modification Date: 2022-04-01 >>>>>> Reference: [RFC7858][RFC8094][RFC-ietf-dprive-dnsoquic-11] >>>>>> >>>>>> Please see >>>>>> https://www.iana.org/assignments/service-names-port-numbers >>>>>> >>>>>> ACTION 3: >>>>>> >>>>>> The following entry has been added to the Extended DNS Error >>>>>> Codes >>>>>> registry: >>>>>> >>>>>> 26 Too Early [RFC-ietf-dprive-dnsoquic-11] >>>>>> >>>>>> Please see >>>>>> https://www.iana.org/assignments/dns-parameters >>>>>> >>>>>> ACTION 4: >>>>>> >>>>>> The following registry has been created under the "Domain Name >>>>>> System >>>>>> (DNS) Parameters" heading: >>>>>> >>>>>> DNS over QUIC Error Codes >>>>>> Expert(s): Unassigned >>>>>> Reference: [RFC-ietf-dprive-dnsoquic-11] >>>>>> Available Formats >>>>>> >>>>>> Range Registration Procedures >>>>>> provisional (greater than 0x3f) Expert Review >>>>>> provisional registration Date field update First Come First >>>>>> Served >>>>>> permanent, 0x00-0x3f Standards Action or IESG Approval >>>>>> permanent, greater than 0x3f Specification Required >>>>>> >>>>>> Value Error Description Status Specification Date >>>>>> Contact >>>>>> >>>>>> 0x0 DOQ_NO_ERROR No error permanent [RFC- >>>>>> ietf- >>>>>> dprive-dnsoquic-11, Section 5.3] 2022-04-01 [DPRIVE_WG] >>>>>> >>>>>> 0x1 DOQ_INTERNAL_ERROR Implementation error permanent >>>>>> [RFC-ietf-dprive-dnsoquic-11, Section 5.3] 2022-04-01 >>>>>> [DPRIVE_WG] >>>>>> >>>>>> 0x2 DOQ_PROTOCOL_ERROR Generic protocol violation >>>>>> permanent [RFC-ietf-dprive-dnsoquic-11, Section 5.3] >>>>>> 2022- >>>>>> 04-01 [DPRIVE_WG] >>>>>> >>>>>> 0x3 DOQ_REQUEST_CANCELLED Request cancelled by client >>>>>> permanent [RFC-ietf-dprive-dnsoquic-11, Section 5.3] >>>>>> 2022- >>>>>> 04-01 [DPRIVE_WG] >>>>>> >>>>>> 0x4 DOQ_EXCESSIVE_LOAD Closing a connection for >>>>>> excessive >>>>>> load permanent [RFC-ietf-dprive-dnsoquic-11, Section 5.3] >>>>>> 2022-04-01 [DPRIVE_WG] >>>>>> >>>>>> 0x5 DOQ_UNSPECIFIED_ERROR No error reason specified >>>>>> permanent [RFC-ietf-dprive-dnsoquic-11, Section 5.3] >>>>>> 2022- >>>>>> 04-01 [DPRIVE_WG] >>>>>> >>>>>> 0xd098ea5e DOQ_ERROR_RESERVED Alternative error code >>>>>> used >>>>>> for tests permanent [RFC-ietf-dprive-dnsoquic-11, Section >>>>>> 5.3] >>>>>> 2022-04-01 [DPRIVE_WG] >>>>>> >>>>>> Please see >>>>>> https://www.iana.org/assignments/dns-parameters >>>>>> >>>>>> Please let us know whether this document's registry actions have >>>>>> been >>>>>> completed correctly. Once we receive your confirmation, we'll >>>>>> notify >>>>>> the RFC Editor that the actions are complete. If a team of >>>>>> authors is >>>>>> responsible for the document, and the actions have been performed >>>>>> correctly, please send a single confirmation message. >>>>>> >>>>>> We'll update any references to this document in the registries >>>>>> when >>>>>> the RFC Editor notifies us that they've assigned an RFC number. >>>>>> >>>>>> Best regards, >>>>>> >>>>>> Amanda Baber >>>>>> IANA Operations Manager >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> > _______________________________________________ dns-privacy mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy
