On 13/11/2014 21:21, David Conrad wrote: > Can we just ask for RIPE.INT to be dropped from the .INT zone?
there isn't enough bikeshed in the universe to handle a suggestion like this. Nick
- Re: [dns-wg] RIPE NCC DNSSEC trust anchors Randy Bush
- Re: [dns-wg] RIPE NCC DNSSEC trust anchors Jim Reid
- Re: [dns-wg] RIPE NCC DNSSEC trust anchors Tony Finch
- Re: [dns-wg] RIPE NCC DNSSEC trust anchors Jim Reid
- Re: [dns-wg] RIPE NCC DNSSEC trust anchors manning bill
- Re: [dns-wg] RIPE NCC DNSSEC trust anchors Doug Barton
- Re: [dns-wg] RIPE NCC DNSSEC trust anchors David Conrad
- [dns-wg] {Use of} the INT TLD {by the NCC and ot... Peter Koch
- [dns-wg] oversight of .int Jim Reid
- Re: [dns-wg] {Use of} the INT TLD {by the NC... David Conrad
- Re: [dns-wg] {Use of} the INT TLD {by th... Nick Hilliard
- Re: [dns-wg] {Use of} the INT TLD {... Doug Barton
- Re: [dns-wg] {Use of} the INT TLD {by th... Peter Koch
- Re: [dns-wg] {Use of} the INT TLD {by the NC... Kim Davies
- Re: [dns-wg] {Use of} the INT TLD {by the NC... Barbara Roseman
- Re: [dns-wg] {Use of} the INT TLD {by th... Doug Barton
- Re: [dns-wg] {Use of} the INT TLD {... Kim Davies
- Re: [dns-wg] {Use of} the INT TLD {... manning bill
- Re: [dns-wg] RIPE NCC DNSSEC trust anchors Romeo Zwart
- Re: [dns-wg] RIPE NCC DNSSEC trust anchors David Conrad
- Re: [dns-wg] RIPE NCC DNSSEC trust anchors Patrik Wallstrom
