On 12 Nov 2015, at 23:45, Jim Martin <[email protected]> wrote: > Can he simply be appointed by acclamation?
Jim, the idea is the WG decides by consensus who fills the vacancy. It will be easier to make that consensus judgement if there are more statements of support (or opposition) for the nominees. Clearly, it would be better if a larger number of WG members than we've seen so far expressed their opinion about who they wanted to appoint. That said, there should be some sort of appointment by acclamation at the WG next week.
