> On 24 May 2016, at 13:41, Shane Kerr <[email protected]> wrote: > > Please let us know what you think about this idea.
<No hats> Before we take this idea forward, could someone please suggest metrics and milestones that could be used to assess the success or failure of this activity? For bonus points, it would be good to know what sort of resource commitments will be needed and the level of reporting that can be expected from the NCC being involved in Yeti DNS. We should be careful to not have the NCC get into open-ended, vague commitments where there's uncertainty about the on-going value to the community. Experiments are all very well but both the WG and the NCC's DNS team need to know how/when to decide to kill the experiment or turn it into a formally supported resource or do something else with it.
