Re: [dns-wg] NCC reverse delegation criteria

[Jim Reid]

> On 12 Jun 2019, at 21:06, Nick Hilliard <n...@foobar.org> wrote:
> 
> we don't really need this because it's not fixing a problem.

Indeed. There’s no problem here that needs fixing.

> ... the RIPE NCC's record for handling dns delegation over the years shows 
> that they're doing a good job and unless this changes, the best thing to do 
> would be to let them continue doing their job as they see fit.

+1.

The current mechanism is working just fine. It isn’t broken.