|
Cheers, my humour is dry, and over-exagerated,
and while my content is serious, I try and humourously exaggerate my standpoint
for the value of a laugh. I am glad to see that both yourself and Ausregistry
are impartial and invite constructive argument. My main point is, advertising-only pages
on a site is not a legitimate use, no matter how anyone (Even Vic) dresses it
up. It is camping, it is junk mail, it is a pollution
of our e-commerce playing field. Instead of a nice level playing field with
nicely cut grass we will be forced to sidestep beer bottles and other rubbish
thrown onto the field from the grandstand during play by irresponsible
spectators, speculators and punters. -Sean. For clarity – I was
not referring to your argument… just the way you put it. I just thought
it was funny that you were going to lynch whomever you deemed responsible for
this travesty. You are entitled to your
opinion, that is what this list is for. Go right ahead. I simply believe you (and
others) would get more traction if you were to construct your arguments in a
mature, concise and logical way. I also think that you
think we (AusRegistry) have a lot (any?) of say in this – we are just
doing our job (irrespective of the policy changes that take place). But thanks for the
judgement all the same. Now, where did my values
go? Hmmm… Adrian
Kinderis From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Sean K. Finn Nice to see you have a vested interest. This wasn’t really targeted at you,
but its surfacing that you are one of the exploiters. I thought as Managing Director of
Ausregistry you would stand aside and be impartial, as well as show some
integrity. You have the most to gain out of seeing
more .com.au’s sold, and it doesn’t matter to you to whom, so its
obvious which side you are on. I cant hold this against you though. I seem to be the only voice of criticism,
looks like there’s no-one left on this list who actually cares anymore. Yes, it is good to sell more domains, no
its not good to sell out your values in doing so. For the past year there has been long
arguments on this list that did not want to see domain camping, yet this is
exactly what is happening. Something is wrong here. -Sean. From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Adrian Kinderis Hung drawn and quartered
hey? Thanks for the Monday
morning laugh… much appreciated. The laughter will cease
should anyone attempt to respond to this drivel, so please… let’s
keep the posts to a minimum… if only for today… (resist the urge
Vic, I know you are out there!) Adrian
Kinderis From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Sean K. Finn dineonline.com.au had a legitimate business associated with
it. Dineonline.com.au was let lapse by a client’s client. As an expiring domain, dineonline.com.au is now registered
to HITPRO PTY LTD, and now redirects to a search page that shows rubbish
content i.e. search pages redirecting to other content. A legitimate user and prior registrant of dineonline.com.au
is now deprived of using this domain, whereas one month prior it would have
been no worries for them to get their domain name back. Yes, I know they should have been vigilant and not let it
lapse, but that’s the reality of Australian businesses. This policy favours only the registrars, and domain
speculators, and domain campers, AND DOES NOT PROMOTE GROWTH OF THE AUSTRALIAN
ECONOMY, AS IT DENIES LEGITIMATE BUSINESS USE of .com.au domain names. This policy does not facilitate e-commerce in JON: Its simple, I suggest rolling back
this policy to disallow advertising and camping, it is the ONLY responsible
use. Don’t you people get this yet? You’ve completely rooted .com.au with this policy of
allowing B.S. advertising You are not care takers of this ccTLD domain, you are
exploiters, and you will be hung drawn and quartered when the appropriate time
comes. Spineless Bastards. |
--------------------------------------------------------------------------- List policy, unsubscribing and archives => http://dotau.org/
