Yes but what is to stop me simply declaring that I'm registering the name under the close and substantial rule because I intend to use it to sell services related to the name, then not doing so. If I don't put up a website, I can't see on what grounds the name could be taken off me, which is what you suggested earlier.
Jon >-- Original Message -- >Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2006 11:57:29 +0100 (BST) >From: David Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: ".au DNS Discussion List" <[email protected]> >Subject: Re: [DNS] Monetised >Reply-To: ".au DNS Discussion List" <[email protected]> > > > >--- Jon Lawrence <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> >Also if you just sit on the domain for two years I >> >cannot see how you will be allowed to renew it >> under >> >the monetisation policy as you haven't used it for >> >monetisation and are not providing that service. >> >> David >> >> You seem to be implying that a website is the only >> use for a domain name. > >No I am saying that if you register a domain by saying >that the service you provide is domain monetisation >then you would need to have a website to provide that >service, which is why auDA clarified the 'close & >substantial' policy regarding monetisation with strict >guidelines. Just like the guidelines they used to take >away several hundred domains from ansearch some while >back. They set a precedent with that case so should >have no issues with following policy regarding >monetisation. In fact it is probably the only auDA >policy that doesn't have that many loopholes. > >DJ > > > >___________________________________________________________ >All New Yahoo! Mail ? Tired of [EMAIL PROTECTED]@! come-ons? Let our SpamGuard >protect >you. http://uk.docs.yahoo.com/nowyoucan.html >--------------------------------------------------------------------------- >List policy, unsubscribing and archives => http://dotau.org/ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- List policy, unsubscribing and archives => http://dotau.org/
