Adrian Chadd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Sun, Nov 12, 2006, Kirk Fletcher wrote: > > > I mentioned in my first email, that most websites would probably > > want to increase their audience as much as possible, provided that > > the benefit outweighted the cost. It might seem noble to suggest > > that it should be implemented "regardless of cost" - but it isn't > > very practical. > > Thats why these sorts of things are legislated - disabilities > aren't about "cost".
absolute rubish. > > > And yes Kirk, I am saying it?s unacceptable, and hopefully > > > illegal, to discriminate against someone because of a whole > > > range of issues, including disabilities. > > > > I think where we differ, David, is in our concept of discrimination. > > And, again, that particular issue - the differing of the concept > of 'discrimiation' - is why these things end up being legislated. > You can't leave it to people to self-regulate on this matter because > (a) its not a question of economics, its a question of social > responsbility social responsible starts with my kids first and you last. Vic --------------------------------------------------------------------------- List policy, unsubscribing and archives => http://dotau.org/
