The key issue with "opening up" .au for direct registration is the
"closing down" of all future 2LDs. It does not make sense to "open" one
new domain extension only to "close" the possibility of any other new
extensions in the future.
Vic Cinc wrote:
from memory 30% of people that responded to the
auda survey wanted to register directly in .au.
that is called a demand. auda has a clear charter to address that demand.
the mechanics of ensuring that the value of .com.au is preserved or
transfered to .au is a separate issue. the Domain Industry Association as put
forward a value preservation scheme for opening up .au. no doubt others can be
considered.
.au is not a democracy, it is a market. there is no right nor mandate
that any form of majority is required to open .au or that any form of
majority can suppress of thwart any demand for direct .au registrations.
Vic
Ian Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 19 Jun 2007, Vic Cinc wrote:
> You have completely ignored the fact that there is a clear demand for
> opening up .au, and as such it is incumbent on the policy panel to address
that
> demand.
The only evident 'demand' for direct registrations under .au is by some
of the 23 registrars, some resellers and a few would-be domaineers.
> The mechanics are a separate issue.
>
> .au is a market not a democracy. There is no implicit right or mandate for
> the policy panel to consider any arguments for thwarting that demand.
Your demands, that is. Unless you're still purporting to 'represent'
all those who had chosen your firm to purchase registration services?
> On the contrary there is an implied mandate for auda to address
> demand for direct .au registrations as the namespace is there for
> the benefit of all australians.
The great majority of submissions to the present panel affirm that
direct registrations would not be to the benefit of the australian
community, but only to those few doing the demanding.
> There was no consultation on opening up state based 2lds, and no
> democratic process or veto was even contemplated.
>
> This is a clear precedent the policy panels must observe.
You're saying that any past errors must be repeated, for consistency.
There are many other precedents that the panel _may_ observe, including
the precedent of overseeing a stable namespace, and that the .au domain
does not exist to serve only those demanding further windfall profits.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
List policy, unsubscribing and archives => http://dotau.org/
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
List policy, unsubscribing and archives => http://dotau.org/
