Ian Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Providing a market to satisfy a need - the market we already have - is > quite different to inventing new 'needs' toward generating new markets.
If I or any other registrar could invent "new" needs, we wouldnt be wasting our time here talking to people like you now would we. attempts at trying to push a need like the id.au debacle, shows clearly you cant invent a "need". > > there is no right nor mandate > > that any form of majority is required to open .au or that any form of > > majority can suppress of thwart any demand for direct .au registrations. > > I'd commend you to Melbourne IT's submission, in this regard at least. I am discussion with MIT on their position. its hardly set in stone. you can be in denial as much as you like, doesnt change the fact that there is a demand for direct .au registration and that auda and the policy panel has a clear mandate to address that demand. the mechanics are a seperate issue and in no way a reason to thwart or supress that demand. Vic --------------------------------------------------------------------------- List policy, unsubscribing and archives => http://dotau.org/
