That's not correct, if that was the case, TCP applications in general would not 
work in anycast setups, which obviously isn't the case.

It's correct that if you'd end up getting rerouted all of a sudden, it would 
trigger a reset, but the application would (likely) still succeed after 
establishing the TCP connection again.

Running DNS (and accepting TCP queries) in an anycasted setup is rather common 
:) I run a few of such setups.


On 2 Apr 2023, at 14:08, Marco Mangione <marco.mangi...@gmail.com> wrote:

becouse of split path routing, there are 2 or more anycast node and network 
load balancing causes packet transmitted to the anycast address to alternate 
between those nodes

Il giorno dom 2 apr 2023 alle ore 08:59 Lucas Rolff 
<lu...@lucasrolff.com<mailto:lu...@lucasrolff.com>> ha scritto:
> Because if traffic is forced on TCP, for example with a TC=1, not everything 
> could work correctly.

Why not?

> On 2 Apr 2023, at 13:55, Marco Mangione via dnsdist 
> <dnsdist@mailman.powerdns.com<mailto:dnsdist@mailman.powerdns.com>> wrote:
>
> Hi everyone,
> I would like to open a conversation about a dnsdist+pdns setup in anycast 
> mode, therefore multiple locations with multiple instances inside.
> All OK if we talk about UDP, but what about TCP? Has anyone had any 
> experience?
>
> Because if traffic is forced on TCP, for example with a TC=1, not everything 
> could work correctly.
>
> M1
> _______________________________________________
> dnsdist mailing list
> dnsdist@mailman.powerdns.com<mailto:dnsdist@mailman.powerdns.com>
> https://mailman.powerdns.com/mailman/listinfo/dnsdist


_______________________________________________
dnsdist mailing list
dnsdist@mailman.powerdns.com
https://mailman.powerdns.com/mailman/listinfo/dnsdist

Reply via email to