On Fri, 7 Apr 2006, Joerg Habenicht wrote:
> > On Thu, 6 Apr 2006, Matt Hull wrote: > > > > > > > On Thu, 6 Apr 2006, Joerg Habenicht wrote: > > > >> The /etc/hosts looks like this: > >> # intern net: > >> 192.168.2.1 minime.mydomain.lan minime > >> ... > >> # DMZ net: > >> 192.168.1.1 minime.mydomain.lan minime > >> 192.168.1.2 jarrel.mydomain.lan jarrel > >> ... > >> > > > > doesnt dnsmasq do the look-ups on the local net that it assigned ip's to ? > > i dont have any ip's like that listed in my etc/host and dnsmasq returns > > the ip of the machine. why do you have the ip's in ext/host ? > > These are the adresses, I give the machines, when querying DHCP. > > > also i only have one interface. > > I got 2 two of them, and want to keep the name of the central knot the > same for both nets. > > > i was going to separate wired and wireless but just > > kept it on one subnet (using wpa-psk) > > Is this better than giving physical distinct nets different subnet > numbers? > I thought with different subnets you keep your routing clear and easy. i think its just a matter of choice and what you want to do. > > > > > matt > > > > > > cu > Joerg > > _______________________________________________ > Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list > Dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk > http://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/dnsmasq-discuss >
