Edson wrote: > > > > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: Simon Kelley [mailto:si...@thekelleys.org.uk] > >> Sent: quinta-feira, 1 de março de 2007 11:21 > >> To: Edson > >> Cc: dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk > >> Subject: Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Problems with SRV Queries > > >> Edson wrote: > >>> Hi, All... > > >>> I'm facing some really wierd situation here... > >>> I have a Grandstream that depends on a SRV querie to resolve the SIP > >> server > >>> address. When I define a SRV clause in the DNSMasq config file, and > >>> configure the Grandstream to use it as DNS server, it works smoothly, > >> the > >>> registration is successful. But if I don't, I see the querie being > >> forwarded > >>> to the DNS upstream server, but the answer never hits the Grandestream. > > >> Small gotcha here: if you are relying on --log-queries for this data, > >> then you won't see the reply logged, only replies to A and AAAA queries > >> get logged. > > > > I'm getting such logs: > > Mar 1 12:53:27 repolho dnsmasq[25013]: query[SRV] _sip._udp.alta.com.br > from 192.168.100.26 > > Mar 1 12:53:27 repolho dnsmasq[25013]: config _sip._udp.alta.com.br is > <NODATA> clue ^^^
This says that the source of the reply is dnsmasq configuration, not a reply from an upstream server. You can see, the querie is present on the INTERNAL, but not on the > EXTERNAL. > > That's expected, given the log. > > For simplicity I reduce the DNSmasq configuration to: > > filterwin2k and here's the culprit: from dnsmasq(8), "--filterwin2k .... The requests blocked are for records of types SOA and SRV" Remove that, and it will all work. Apologies, I should have included --filterwin2k in my list of options which could intercept queries. Cheers, Simon.
