On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 7:21 PM, Ed W <li...@wildgooses.com> wrote: > On 15/08/2011 14:16, richardvo...@gmail.com wrote: >>> The next step is to focus on the changes required at the dnsmasq level >>> (client side). I appreciate your suggestions regarding the CPAN >>> modules, but I'm intending for this to function on small embedded >>> devices (typically ~4MB flash), and getting Perl on there is quite >>> unlikely. >> >> miniperl and microperl are pretty small, although distributions for >> such routers may have crammed the flash nearly full already. > > I think if you want perl then you need perl. It's a nice idea, but with > only 4MB you need to look at something more compact than perl
Hello, If you are too concerned about space or cant cross compile perl, i have a patch that does what you want to do. Its not much, but should help you. http://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/pipermail/dnsmasq-discuss/2011q2/005050.html