On 06/02/13 07:29, Tomas Hozza wrote: > ----- Original Message ----- >> On 02/05/2013 03:13 PM, Tomas Hozza wrote: >>> I can do that and doing my best in Fedora and RHEL. >> I had not noticed your email address until just now. It is Fedora >> and RHEL that I had in mind but, IIRC, there are other distributions that >> have non-current dnsmasq. As far as that goes, Fedora 17 had >> dnsmasq-2.59 until I griped about it and then the updates were >> promptly made. > > I'm maintaining dnsmasq only since 2012-10-22. I can't tell how it > was before. Maintainers also have more than one package to look after > so we have to prioritize work to fix more serious bugs first. > >> With something link dnsmasq it pays to keep as "currrent" as you can. > > I agree. I noticed this during last couple of months, too. >
I'm open to comments about the dnsmasq release process. Would people prefer more/less frequent releases? A different sequence to the test->rc->release currently used. Stable and development streams? Cheers, Simon. _______________________________________________ Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/dnsmasq-discuss
