> Is unbound-anchor fairly stand-alone? Maybe run unbound-anchor and > then covert the format of the resulting trust-anchors file would be > a viable solution?
Fairly, yes, but: if people can run unbound-anchor they have Unbound, so
what would be the point of dnsmasq as a validator? ;-)
-JP
_______________________________________________
Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list
Dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk
http://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/dnsmasq-discuss
