On 02/04/14 21:24, Simon Kelley wrote: > > This is, I think, just an oversight. synth-domain certainly generates > "Locally defined DNS records" which is what the auth-zone is specified > to contain. >
Actually, there is a reason. It doesn't in general make sense to include the records created by synth-domain in a zone transfer, since there are likely to be a lot of them. They could be included in answers for the auth-zone, at the expense of the additional complication that the zone answered by dnsmasq becomes no longer exactly the zone that's transfered to a secondary (since the synth-domain answers can't be included in the transfer). Simon. _______________________________________________ Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list Dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk http://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/dnsmasq-discuss
