-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 06/04/14 12:38, Olivier Mauras wrote: > >
>> How much does a cache miss cost. Why bother tuning the TTLs and >> _still_ risking that you've made them too long and something >> breaks. Caching is an optimisation. If an optimisation can lead >> to different results in in the system, then it's broken and >> should be turned off, not tweaked so it breaks less often. >>> > I agree, but in my case i would like to make them shorter than the > default TTL from upstream. I guess the workaround, would be to give > a globally shorter TTL to clients, just less efficient if i need to > override like 10 entries... That's available, see --max-ttl Cheers, Simon. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iEYEARECAAYFAlNDFg4ACgkQKPyGmiibgre9JgCgnXmjgL4nmrd+WuEimjX1yejk t4MAniLwyN8uAQ42lT5uMeC5/QIdrsh9 =jW+p -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list Dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk http://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/dnsmasq-discuss
