Hi list,

writing together the problem sometimes brings enlightement:

"bind-interfaces" option does the wanted thing.

Thanks for reading!

Oliver


Am 24.06.2014 23:28, schrieb Oliver Rath:
> Hi list,
>
> i try to restrict the dns of dnsmasq to one interface (3 existing
> interfaces, I hided ppp0), but it seems, that it doesnt work.
>
> My config:
>
> server=//141.1.1.1
> local=/heimserver/
> address=/owncloud/192.168.0.254
> dhcp-range=set:gw2,192.168.2.50,192.168.2.150,255.255.255.0,12h
> dhcp-range=::,constructor:sixxs,ra-names
> dhcp-range=::,constructor:p3p1,ra-names
> dhcp-option=tag:gw2,128,192.168.2.254
> dhcp-option=252,"http://heimserver/wpad.dat";
> dhcp-option-force=208,f1:00:74:7e
> dhcp-option-force=210,/opt/dmi/tftproot/
> dhcp-boot=undionly.kkpxe
> enable-tftp
> tftp-root=/opt/dmi/tftproot
> log-queries
> log-dhcp
>
> my ifconfig.
>
> # ifconfig | grep mtu -A1
> lo: flags=73<UP,LOOPBACK,RUNNING>  mtu 65536
>         inet 127.0.0.1  netmask 255.0.0.0
> --
> p1p1: flags=4163<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST>  mtu 1500
>         inet 192.168.0.254  netmask 255.255.255.0  broadcast 192.168.0.255
> --
> p2p1: flags=4099<UP,BROADCAST,MULTICAST>  mtu 1500
>         inet 192.168.11.254  netmask 255.255.255.0  broadcast 192.168.11.255
> --
> p3p1: flags=4163<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST>  mtu 1500
>         inet 192.168.2.254  netmask 255.255.255.0  broadcast 192.168.2.255
>
>
>
> So here only p3p1 is addressed here. But if i look for open ports, on
> all interfaces 53 is open:
>
> # nmap 192.168.11.254
>
> Starting Nmap 6.25 ( http://nmap.org ) at 2014-06-24 23:16 CEST
> Nmap scan report for 192.168.11.254
> Host is up (0.00014s latency).
> Not shown: 997 closed ports
> PORT     STATE SERVICE
> 53/tcp   open  domain
> 749/tcp  open  kerberos-adm
> 2000/tcp open  cisco-sccp
>
> Nmap done: 1 IP address (1 host up) scanned in 0.76 seconds
> heimserver dnsmasq.d # nmap 192.168.2.254
>
> Starting Nmap 6.25 ( http://nmap.org ) at 2014-06-24 23:16 CEST
> Nmap scan report for 192.168.2.254
> Host is up (0.00040s latency).
> Not shown: 997 closed ports
> PORT     STATE SERVICE
> 53/tcp   open  domain
> 749/tcp  open  kerberos-adm
> 2000/tcp open  cisco-sccp
>
> Nmap done: 1 IP address (1 host up) scanned in 1.72 seconds
> heimserver dnsmasq.d # nmap 192.168.0.254
>  
> Starting Nmap 6.25 ( http://nmap.org ) at 2014-06-24 23:16 CEST
> Nmap scan report for heimserver.koenigsteinstr.muc (192.168.0.254)
> Host is up (0.00011s latency).
> Not shown: 997 closed ports
> PORT     STATE SERVICE
> 53/tcp   open  domain
> 749/tcp  open  kerberos-adm
> 2000/tcp open  cisco-sccp
>
> for being sure, dnsmasq is the only dns-server here, i did this:
>
> # netstat -vanpe | grep :53
> netstat: no support for `AF INET (sctp)' on this system.
> netstat: no support for `AF INET (sctp)' on this system.
> tcp        0      0 0.0.0.0:53              0.0.0.0:*              
> LISTEN      0          1701253    12137/dnsmasq      
> tcp        0      0 192.168.0.254:5038      192.168.0.1:53788      
> VERBUNDEN   101        1666180    27070/asterisk     
> tcp6       0      0 :::53                   :::*                   
> LISTEN      0          1701256    12137/dnsmasq      
> udp        0      0 0.0.0.0:53             
> 0.0.0.0:*                           0          1701252   
> 12137/dnsmasq      
> udp6       0      0 :::53                  
> :::*                                0          1701255   
> 12137/dnsmasq      
> netstat: no support for `AF IPX' on this system.
> netstat: no support for `AF AX25' on this system.
> netstat: no support for `AF X25' on this system.
> netstat: no support for `AF NETROM' on this system.
>
> So whats wrong here? Has dnsmasq problems with interfaces named p1p1,
> p2p1 etc. ?
>
> Tfh!
> Oliver
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list
> Dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk
> http://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/dnsmasq-discuss


_______________________________________________
Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list
Dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk
http://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/dnsmasq-discuss

Reply via email to