On 17/09/14 21:47, Simon Kelley wrote: > To make this work, you'd need some extra semantics, either explicit or > implicit, to enable the old binding to be abandoned. Abandoning a > binding is dangerous, since when it granted the lease, the server was > promising the client exclusive use of the IP address. There is precedent > for this: the form of dhcp-host which has more than one MAC address > allows exactly then abandonment of a lease to one MAC address in favour > of the other one. > > It would be possible to define the dhcp-host=tag:cid0,192.168.2.99 form > as having the same properties, or require some special keyword to enable > this behaviour. > > I think this covers Neil's points as well, part from the PXE one. There ^^^^^^
Sorry, this should be "Jason's" ETOMANYEMAILS > is already some logic that tries to do the right thing when the same MAC > address sometimes presents a client-id, and sometimes doesn't. It > doesn't solve the case of two different client-ids at differnet points > in the netboot, AFAIK. > > > Cheers, > > Simon. > >> >> Regards >> /Joachim >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list >> Dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk >> http://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/dnsmasq-discuss >> > _______________________________________________ Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list Dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk http://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/dnsmasq-discuss