On 07/04/2016 11:29 AM, Ivan Kokshaysky wrote:
To fix that we need to purge the netlink buffer on ENOBUF error. With the appended patch dnsmasq is running flawlessly for about a month.
why are the messages not removed from the buffer when they are processed? or are they and there's simply too many messages coming in to handle?
how large is the buffer? can it be made larger to handle the larger amount of message traffic?
what problem(s) will requesting devices run into when there is no response to their query when the message is flushed?
would fixing/solving (one of?) the above be better than flushing? -- NOTE: No off-list assistance is given without prior approval. *Please keep mailing list traffic on the list* unless private contact is specifically requested and granted. _______________________________________________ Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list Dnsmasqfirstname.lastname@example.org http://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/dnsmasq-discuss