> On 14 Jan 2018, at 22:12, Simon Kelley <si...@thekelleys.org.uk> wrote: > > Right, I thought about this again, and concluded that whilst sharing the > "now use the time" function with something other than "reload loads of > stuff" is an improvement, it doesn't really get us that much farther to > share with something else, since conflicts could still arise. <snip> > Given that this is a meant to be a definitive solution, I judge it's > worth taking the one-time backward compatibility hit, and have left out > the ability to select which signal to use. > > http://thekelleys.org.uk/gitweb/?p=dnsmasq.git;a=commitdiff;h=3c973ad92d317df736d5a8fde67baba6b102d91e > > > Comments?
Beyond “gaaahhhhhh why didn’t I think of SIGINT”….. excellent. Understand the reasoning, agree, running chez Kevin and backport for LEDE master submitted. Thank you muchly. Cheers, Kevin D-B 012C ACB2 28C6 C53E 9775 9123 B3A2 389B 9DE2 334A
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
_______________________________________________ Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list Dnsmasqfirstname.lastname@example.org http://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/dnsmasq-discuss