> On 14 Jan 2018, at 22:12, Simon Kelley <si...@thekelleys.org.uk> wrote:
> Right, I thought about this again, and concluded that whilst sharing the
> "now use the time" function with something other than "reload loads of
> stuff" is an improvement, it doesn't really get us that much farther to
> share with something else, since conflicts could still arise.
> Given that this is a meant to be a definitive solution, I judge it's
> worth taking the one-time backward compatibility hit, and have left out
> the ability to select which signal to use.
> http://thekelleys.org.uk/gitweb/?p=dnsmasq.git;a=commitdiff;h=3c973ad92d317df736d5a8fde67baba6b102d91e
> Comments?

Beyond “gaaahhhhhh why didn’t I think of SIGINT”….. excellent.  Understand the 
reasoning, agree, running chez Kevin and backport for LEDE master submitted.

Thank you muchly.


Kevin D-B

012C ACB2 28C6 C53E 9775  9123 B3A2 389B 9DE2 334A

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP

Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list

Reply via email to