In article <11034711-6140-1e7c-5eeb-ad951fee2...@thekelleys.org.uk>,
Simon Kelley<si...@thekelleys.org.uk> wrote:
> My second example gives exactly that. To clarify, the serial numbers in
> the names correspond to the addresses in the range supplied. If you use
> a subnet to specify the range, for instance 192.168.202.0/24, then yes
> dyn-1 will be 192.168.202.0, but if you use start,end to specify the
> range, then the start address becomes dyn-1, so for
> 192.168.202.50 is dyn-1
Ah, apologies, I hadn't realised that. In that case then, this sounds
perfect to meet my needs.
> (or maybe dyn-0. Do we want this one-based or zero-based? Having a
> choice is NOT an option)
I think I'd want dyn-1 personally, but don't feel particularly strongly
about it either way to be honest.
Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list