Finally got around to doing this.
On 19/02/18 09:16, Andy Hawkins wrote:
> In article <11034711-6140-1e7c-5eeb-ad951fee2...@thekelleys.org.uk>,
> Simon Kelley<si...@thekelleys.org.uk> wrote:
>> My second example gives exactly that. To clarify, the serial numbers in
>> the names correspond to the addresses in the range supplied. If you use
>> a subnet to specify the range, for instance 192.168.202.0/24, then yes
>> dyn-1 will be 192.168.202.0, but if you use start,end to specify the
>> range, then the start address becomes dyn-1, so for
>> 192.168.202.50 is dyn-1
> Ah, apologies, I hadn't realised that. In that case then, this sounds
> perfect to meet my needs.
>> (or maybe dyn-0. Do we want this one-based or zero-based? Having a
>> choice is NOT an option)
> I think I'd want dyn-1 personally, but don't feel particularly strongly
> about it either way to be honest.
> Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list
Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list