On 19/07/2018 21:34, Simon Kelley wrote:
This generates multiple instance of the DHCP option 121 in the DHCP
reply packet, which isn't strictly legal.

What makes you think it's not legal?
RFC3442 makes no mention of it not being legal and RFC3396 describes how multiple instances of options should be concatenated when an options data exceeds 255 bytes.

dhcpcd of course supports this :)


Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list

Reply via email to