Kevin's analysis is spot-on, as is his patch, which I've just applied.

Cheers,

Simon.


On 26/10/2018 00:24, Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant wrote:
> 
> 
>> On 25 Oct 2018, at 21:38, Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant 
>> <ke...@darbyshire-bryant.me.uk> wrote:
>>
>> I think Openwrt is safe.   There will be a loud scream from me if it isn’t 
>> :-)
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Kevin D-B
>>
> 
> In fact to prove it to myself I had a go at removing the NO_FORK compile time 
> option (patch attached) and had no obvious problem with the resultant binary 
> on Openwrt.
> 
> Whether Simon implements the change as I have done or takes the opportunity 
> to simplify things that I don’t understand I don’t know, but NO_FORK v 
> OPT_NO_FORK are different things and OPT_NO_FORK relies on NO_FORK *NOT* 
> being defined.
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Kevin D-B
> 
> 012C ACB2 28C6 C53E 9775  9123 B3A2 389B 9DE2 334A
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list
> Dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk
> http://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/dnsmasq-discuss
> 


_______________________________________________
Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list
Dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk
http://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/dnsmasq-discuss

Reply via email to