Kevin's analysis is spot-on, as is his patch, which I've just applied.
Cheers, Simon. On 26/10/2018 00:24, Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant wrote: > > >> On 25 Oct 2018, at 21:38, Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant >> <ke...@darbyshire-bryant.me.uk> wrote: >> >> I think Openwrt is safe. There will be a loud scream from me if it isn’t >> :-) >> >> Cheers, >> >> Kevin D-B >> > > In fact to prove it to myself I had a go at removing the NO_FORK compile time > option (patch attached) and had no obvious problem with the resultant binary > on Openwrt. > > Whether Simon implements the change as I have done or takes the opportunity > to simplify things that I don’t understand I don’t know, but NO_FORK v > OPT_NO_FORK are different things and OPT_NO_FORK relies on NO_FORK *NOT* > being defined. > > Cheers, > > Kevin D-B > > 012C ACB2 28C6 C53E 9775 9123 B3A2 389B 9DE2 334A > > > _______________________________________________ > Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list > Dnsmasqfirstname.lastname@example.org > http://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/dnsmasq-discuss > _______________________________________________ Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list Dnsmasqemail@example.com http://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/dnsmasq-discuss