On Thu, Apr 04, 2019 at 05:37:57PM +0000, Conrad Kostecki wrote: > Hi Geert, > > Am 04.04.2019 14:55:47, "Geert Stappers" <stapp...@hendrikx-itc.nl> schrieb: > > > > > The fritzbox is 192.168.178.1, dnsmasq machine is 192.168.32.1. > This is fine. My current setup with an linux router uses 192.168.32.0/24. > The test with the FritzBox was completly standalone and not connected in any > way to my current subnet. > I was just testing, if DHCP itself would succssed, when an other router acts > as server.
OK. Thanks for the elaboration > > Both hand out subnet mask 255.255.255.0, none provides a client IP address. > So /24 is correct here. Yep > What what do you mean by none provied client ip address? I was wrong, I should have looked better. I saw only Client IP address: 0.0.0.0 The next line in Wireshark shows Your (client) IP address: 192.168.32.179 (dnsmasq) Your (client) IP address: 192.168.178.20 (fritzbox) Sorry Groeten Geert Stappers -- Leven en laten leven _______________________________________________ Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list Dnsmasqemail@example.com http://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/dnsmasq-discuss