On Mon, 2019-04-08 at 20:41 +0100, Simon Kelley wrote: > > I've to give it some thought about how we could support multiple Dnsmasq > > instances in > > combination with UBus. Not sure how the DBus implementation would handle > > this... > > It doesn't: the path is a compile-time parameter. > > It's not clear that the entities on the other end of the UBus under > openwrt could cope with multiple instances. The pragmatic solution might > be to turn Ubus off for one of them.
There's one solution I can think of: making the name under which we register the UBus object configurable (with "dnsmasq" as default for backwards compatibility). It would allow multiple instances to be configured each with their own unique name. We could extend the existing `enable-ubus` flag to allow this name to be supplied from the command line/configuration file. @Simon Kelley: WDYT? _______________________________________________ Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list Dnsmasqemail@example.com http://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/dnsmasq-discuss