Hi Vladislav, No, I am talking about different issue, commit already released in latest release. It was introduced by commit . I have no proper fix for it yet, but revert offending commit.
I think you were mentioning issue is have different reproducer for , TCP no longer listened on interface after recreation. I have working fix to that too , applied already in Fedora. Only feedback so far was issue with , sounds good. Original issue with the same address is already fixed. But my Thunderbird does not display it well, maybe others have also issues with it. That is why I started creating pull requests to myself... 1. http://thekelleys.org.uk/gitweb/?p=dnsmasq.git;a=commit;h=0a496f059c1e9d75c33cce4c1211d58422ba4f62 2. https://github.com/InfrastructureServices/dnsmasq-tests/blob/master/bz1728701.sh 3. https://github.com/InfrastructureServices/dnsmasq/pull/1 On 8/28/19 1:25 PM, Vladislav Grishenko wrote: > Hi, Petr, > > Just worrying, isn't this bug a side effect of previous interface-related > binding patch we're talking about? > If yes, since it's not in upstream, it can be quite tricky to reproduce it on > vanilla sources. > > Best Regards, Vladislav Grishenko > > -----Original Message----- > From: Dnsmasq-discuss <dnsmasq-discuss-boun...@lists.thekelleys.org.uk> On > Behalf Of Petr Mensik > Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2019 12:11 PM > To: firstname.lastname@example.org > Subject: Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] [BUG] RA are sent too fast and slows down the > machine > > Hi Iain, > > of course. I am sorry, forgot to add a link as intended. Used base report > from Network Manager tester report. I added it to Fedora bug mentioned, but > forgot to add script itself. At least to me, it produces tens of RA announces. > > Regards, > Petr > >  > https://github.com/InfrastructureServices/dnsmasq-tests/blob/master/bz1739797.sh > > On 8/27/19 10:45 AM, Iain Lane wrote: >> On Wed, Aug 21, 2019 at 08:59:07PM +0200, Petr Mensik wrote: >>> Hi Simon and Maarten, >>> >>> we discovered when playing with NetworkManager-ci , that lastest >>> release is somehow broken. Test running dnsmasq are quite slow on >>> latest release. >>> >>> I have created repeatable started script that reproduces it. Then >>> used git bisect to find when it was broken. It seems fast sending >>> were intentional in commit 0a496f059c1e9 , but maybe way it >>> affects the system were underestimated. It is significant for systems >>> that hit such issue. I think it has to be fixed to slow it down to >>> short time interval, not endless loop. Reported as Fedora bug . >> >> Thanks for this Petr. Would you be able to share the script you've >> used, so that perhaps an upstream developer could recreate the bug? >> >> Mainly I wanted to chime in and say that (in addition to the other >> instance referenced), we found this in the NetworkManager testsuite in >> Ubuntu. I didn't come up with a nice reproducer at the time, but we >> did identify the same commit and we've reverted it in Ubuntu. I posted >> on the ML back then but we didn't get much traction and I didn't >> follow up very aggressively. >> >> >> http://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/pipermail/dnsmasq-discuss/2018q4/012709 >> .html >> >> >> https://launchpadlibrarian.net/405377161/dnsmasq_2.80-1_2.80-1ubuntu1.diff.gz >> (the commit ID referenced in the changelog there seems or from >> somewhere else, it's the same patch) >> >> Cheers, >> -- Petr Menšík Software Engineer Red Hat, http://www.redhat.com/ email: pemen...@redhat.com PGP: 65C6C973 _______________________________________________ Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list Dnsmasqemail@example.com http://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/dnsmasq-discuss