On Sun, Jan 12, 2020 at 08:48:53PM +0100, Dominik wrote:
> On Sun, 2020-01-12 at 16:40 +0100, Geert Stappers wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 09, 2020 at 10:33:43PM +0100, Geert Stappers wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jan 08, 2020 at 04:37:32PM +0000, Harry Moyes wrote:
> > > > On 08/01/2020 14:47, wkitt...@gmail.com wrote:
> > > > >  ...
> > > > 
> > > > I've already mentioned this to the developers.
> > > 
> > > Any prove of that?
> > > 
> > > 
> > > > The change is apparently intentional.
> > >  
> > > Assumed or documented?
> > > 
> > 
> > My questions from above are indeed terse.
> > 
> > Let me elaborate
> > > > > I've already mentioned this to the developers.
> > > > 
> > > > Any prove of that?
> > 
> > That question was written in the hope of getting an URL or email
> > where can be read what was mentioned to the pihole developers.
> > 
> > I still hope such email or URL pops up. The idea is to ask,
> > differently as previously, to regain the lost functionality.
> >  
> > 
> Hey all,
> 
> I may speak up as the main developer of Pi-hole's dnsmasq fork. We
> embed dnsmasq into our daemon. The "dnsmasq -v" functionality is not
> "gone", it just moved one step away as dnsmasq is only contained and
> not the main application in our setup.
> 
> So this statement is simply not true.
> > The pihole derivative has lost that rather useful feature, so
> exactly what options it has been complied with is hard to tell.
> 
> Use
> pihole-FTL -v
> to get the version of our daemon.
> 
> Use
> pihole-FTL -- -v
> to get the version of the embedded dnsmasq.
> 
> I can already tell you that it will bring up
> > Dnsmasq version pi-hole-2.80  Copyright (c) 2000-2018 Simon Kelley
> > Compile time options: IPv6 GNU-getopt no-DBus no-i18n no-IDN DHCP
> >   DHCPv6 no-Lua TFTP no-conntrack ipset auth DNSSEC loop-detect
> >   inotify dumpfile
> 
> This issue has been extensively discussed here as well:
> https://discourse.pi-hole.net/t/struggling-with-pihole-ftl/26473
> and I have to admit that it's still not clear what was/is the error but
> it looks like a user induced one. Also because the problem just
> "disappeared" after some config changes that, apparently, cannot be
> isolated any more.

OK

 
> I also already mentioned how to obtain the embedded dnsmasq's version
> here on Jan 1st, 2020:
> https://discourse.pi-hole.net/t/struggling-with-pihole-ftl/26473/39?u=dl6er
> which was one week before the original poster claimed that we removed
> this intentionally ... interesting to see how perspectives can differ.

Yes, perspectives differ.
It becomes hard when the focal point isn't the same.



Regards
Geert Stappers
-- 
Leven en laten leven

_______________________________________________
Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list
Dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk
http://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/dnsmasq-discuss

Reply via email to