On Sun, Jan 12, 2020 at 08:48:53PM +0100, Dominik wrote: > On Sun, 2020-01-12 at 16:40 +0100, Geert Stappers wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 09, 2020 at 10:33:43PM +0100, Geert Stappers wrote: > > > On Wed, Jan 08, 2020 at 04:37:32PM +0000, Harry Moyes wrote: > > > > On 08/01/2020 14:47, wkitt...@gmail.com wrote: > > > > > ... > > > > > > > > I've already mentioned this to the developers. > > > > > > Any prove of that? > > > > > > > > > > The change is apparently intentional. > > > > > > Assumed or documented? > > > > > > > My questions from above are indeed terse. > > > > Let me elaborate > > > > > I've already mentioned this to the developers. > > > > > > > > Any prove of that? > > > > That question was written in the hope of getting an URL or email > > where can be read what was mentioned to the pihole developers. > > > > I still hope such email or URL pops up. The idea is to ask, > > differently as previously, to regain the lost functionality. > > > > > Hey all, > > I may speak up as the main developer of Pi-hole's dnsmasq fork. We > embed dnsmasq into our daemon. The "dnsmasq -v" functionality is not > "gone", it just moved one step away as dnsmasq is only contained and > not the main application in our setup. > > So this statement is simply not true. > > The pihole derivative has lost that rather useful feature, so > exactly what options it has been complied with is hard to tell. > > Use > pihole-FTL -v > to get the version of our daemon. > > Use > pihole-FTL -- -v > to get the version of the embedded dnsmasq. > > I can already tell you that it will bring up > > Dnsmasq version pi-hole-2.80 Copyright (c) 2000-2018 Simon Kelley > > Compile time options: IPv6 GNU-getopt no-DBus no-i18n no-IDN DHCP > > DHCPv6 no-Lua TFTP no-conntrack ipset auth DNSSEC loop-detect > > inotify dumpfile > > This issue has been extensively discussed here as well: > https://discourse.pi-hole.net/t/struggling-with-pihole-ftl/26473 > and I have to admit that it's still not clear what was/is the error but > it looks like a user induced one. Also because the problem just > "disappeared" after some config changes that, apparently, cannot be > isolated any more.
OK > I also already mentioned how to obtain the embedded dnsmasq's version > here on Jan 1st, 2020: > https://discourse.pi-hole.net/t/struggling-with-pihole-ftl/26473/39?u=dl6er > which was one week before the original poster claimed that we removed > this intentionally ... interesting to see how perspectives can differ. Yes, perspectives differ. It becomes hard when the focal point isn't the same. Regards Geert Stappers -- Leven en laten leven _______________________________________________ Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list Dnsmasqemail@example.com http://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/dnsmasq-discuss