On 31/01/2020 12:34, Abhishek Patti wrote: > Hi > > We needed dnsmasq to have capability of SRV caching, so I have complied > dnsmasq from source using following dockerfile > > " > FROM ubuntu:bionic > MAINTAINER "Abhishek Patti <abpa...@cisco.com <mailto:abpa...@cisco.com>>" > > RUN apt-get update && apt-get install -y gettext > libnetfilter-conntrack-dev libidn2-dev libdbus-1-dev libgmp-dev > nettle-dev libbsd-dev liblua5.2-dev build-essential devscripts > COPY dnsmasq ./ > RUN debuild -b -uc -us > > " > this gives me dnsmasq_2.81-1_all.deb > > however when i upgrade existing/running version of dnsmasq (2.79) on > ubuntu and run command "dnsmasq --version:, it upgraded successfully but > shows "UNKNOWN" > > " dnsmasq --version > Dnsmasq version UNKNOWN Copyright (c) 2000-2020 Simon Kelley > Compile time options: IPv6 GNU-getopt DBus no-UBus i18n IDN2 DHCP DHCPv6 > no-Lua TFTP conntrack ipset auth DNSSEC loop-detect inotify dumpfile > > This software comes with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY. > Dnsmasq is free software, and you are welcome to redistribute it > under the terms of the GNU General Public License, version 2 or 3." > > Please let me know >
The version string compiled into the code is derived from the git tags, either directly from git is you're compiling in a git repository, or from a substituted format string if you're compiling from from tarball extracted from a git repository. Failing either of those, you can edit a suitable string into the file VERSION to get something useful. Cheers, Simon. > > > > On Thu, Jan 30, 2020 at 4:05 AM > <dnsmasq-discuss-requ...@lists.thekelleys.org.uk > <mailto:dnsmasq-discuss-requ...@lists.thekelleys.org.uk>> wrote: > > Send Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list submissions to > dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk > <mailto:dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk> > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > http://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/dnsmasq-discuss > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > dnsmasq-discuss-requ...@lists.thekelleys.org.uk > <mailto:dnsmasq-discuss-requ...@lists.thekelleys.org.uk> > > You can reach the person managing the list at > dnsmasq-discuss-ow...@lists.thekelleys.org.uk > <mailto:dnsmasq-discuss-ow...@lists.thekelleys.org.uk> > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of Dnsmasq-discuss digest..." > > > Today's Topics: > > 1. Re: Active-passive failover for dnsmasq with ldirectord > (Tom Fernandes) > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Message: 1 > Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2020 22:32:28 +0100 > From: Tom Fernandes <anyaddr...@gmx.net <mailto:anyaddr...@gmx.net>> > To: dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk > <mailto:dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk> > Subject: Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Active-passive failover for dnsmasq > with ldirectord > Message-ID: <602f303e-0198-b3b2-fd4f-3d684d08a...@gmx.net > <mailto:602f303e-0198-b3b2-fd4f-3d684d08a...@gmx.net>> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 > > Hi again, > > are there some points in my description that are unclear? > > Feedback concerning this setup is very much appreciated! > > Warm regards, > > > Tom > > On 23/01/2020 15:08, Tom Fernandes wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I read the old threads regarding dnsmasq and high availability and > would > > like to know if the following setup is possible or if I'm missing > something. > > > > Master: dnsmasq A (192.168.1.10) > > Slave: dnsmasq B (192.168.1.20) > > > > Loadbalancer virtual IP in ldirectord 192.168.1.30 > > > > The clients use the virtual IP 192.168.1.30 as their nameserver. > > > > Host A is a "normally" configured dnsmasq server which also offers > DHCP. > > > > Host B is configured the same way like server A with addition of an > > iptables rule which blocks incoming DHCP-Requests. > > > > The configuration files + the DHCP leases file are on a shared > > (active-active) Cluster-FS available to A and B. > > > > ldirectord is configured with with one realserver (A) and one fallback > > server (B). In this configuration a connection to 192.168.1.30 > will only > > lookup records from host A (as long as A is alive). > > > > When A goes down, the following will happen: > > 1) The fallback server B will be used when clients lookup records from > > 192.168.1.30 > > 2) The loadbalancer will connect (through ldirectords > "fallbackcommand" > > with the "start" parameter) via SSH to server B and remove the > iptables > > rule which blocks incoming DHCP requests and will restart dnsmasq. > > > > Now server B is offering DHCP and DNS requests in the same way like > > server A was doing before. > > > > When server A gets online again the "fallbackcommand" on the > > loadbalancer is called again (this time with the "stop" parameter). It > > will now connect to server A and restart dnsmasq and to server B > and set > > the iptables rule again to block incoming DHCP requests. Server B will > > become the fallback server again. > > > > What do you think? > > > > Warm regards, > > > > > > Tom > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list > > Dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk > <mailto:Dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk> > > http://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/dnsmasq-discuss > > > > > > ------------------------------ > > Subject: Digest Footer > > _______________________________________________ > Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list > Dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk > <mailto:Dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk> > http://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/dnsmasq-discuss > > > ------------------------------ > > End of Dnsmasq-discuss Digest, Vol 176, Issue 36 > ************************************************ > > > > -- > abhishek > > _______________________________________________ > Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list > Dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk > http://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/dnsmasq-discuss > _______________________________________________ Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list Dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk http://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/dnsmasq-discuss
