On Wed, Apr 15, 2020 at 07:27:02PM +0100, Josh H wrote: > On Wed, 15 Apr 2020 at 19:17, Geert Stappers <stapp...@stappers.nl> wrote: > > Josh H wrote in another message: > > ( > > http://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/pipermail/dnsmasq-discuss/2020q2/013988.html > > ) > > > > > I'm running a very odd environment in that I'm using 2 usermodelinux > > > virtual machines connected via a virtual hub. > > > > Seems to me something that should work. > > > > However I have no exprience with UML > > > > > > > > > I've got such a simple > > > setup because originally I had a much larger configuration and wanted > > > to test it wasn't something messed up in routing and such. > > > > Oops. The simple setup doesn't work. > > > > In case there are two UML VMs that "see each other" through > > the vHub, feel free to share that config with us. > > > > > > > Just wanted to add that dnsmasq 2.62 with a much older Linux kernel > > > (3.2 from memory?) worked on this sort of setup perfectly fine, so > > > it seems thats either the kernel update or a newer version of dnsmasq > > > has broken something along the way. > > > > I don't understand, but yes indeed > > Kernel, libc and dnsmasq should be alined. > > > > > > > It's difficult for me to share the config outright as I'm using a modified > version of netkit that I've updated to a much newer kernel - > http://netkit-ng.github.io/. The netkit version that is available on that > link is the one that worked with dnsmasq just fine, and that version was > 2.62 and kernel 3.2. However I've updated it and am running 2.80 and kernel > 5.6. > > Anything else I can provide you with that might help? It's a very unique > setup so I appreciate it's probably not the easiest thing to try and > debug.
Choose: Something that is unique or something that can be shared Regards Geert Stappers -- Silence is hard to parse _______________________________________________ Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list Dnsmasqemail@example.com http://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/dnsmasq-discuss