I think it is not, since it does not handle delegation itself. It uses
upstream resolvers to do that work for it. If upstream limits processed
redirections, it should be ok.

But that is just my personal opinion and might be wrong.

Regards,
Petr

On 5/21/20 1:26 AM, Neal P. Murphy wrote:
> Is dnsmasq vulnerable to NXNSAttack?
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list
> Dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk
> http://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/dnsmasq-discuss
> 

-- 
Petr Menšík
Software Engineer
Red Hat, http://www.redhat.com/
email: pemen...@redhat.com
PGP: DFCF908DB7C87E8E529925BC4931CA5B6C9FC5CB

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

_______________________________________________
Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list
Dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk
http://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/dnsmasq-discuss

Reply via email to