I think it is not, since it does not handle delegation itself. It uses upstream resolvers to do that work for it. If upstream limits processed redirections, it should be ok.
But that is just my personal opinion and might be wrong. Regards, Petr On 5/21/20 1:26 AM, Neal P. Murphy wrote: > Is dnsmasq vulnerable to NXNSAttack? > > _______________________________________________ > Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list > Dnsmasqemail@example.com > http://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/dnsmasq-discuss > -- Petr Menšík Software Engineer Red Hat, http://www.redhat.com/ email: pemen...@redhat.com PGP: DFCF908DB7C87E8E529925BC4931CA5B6C9FC5CB
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list Dnsmasqfirstname.lastname@example.org http://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/dnsmasq-discuss