On 18/02/2021 12:47, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: >> On 17/02/2021 13:54, Etan Kissling wrote: >>> When submitting a patch I noticed that the Dnsmasq mailing list modifies >>> the subject of the email (prefix [Dnsmasq-discuss]) as well as appends >>> 'Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list' information to the end of my message. >>> >>> These modifications break DKIM signatures of our emails, leading to them >>> being filtered into Junk folders. DMARC is a security standard for >>> accessing email authenticity. >>> >>> See my earlier patch: >>> - [PATCH v4] Connection track mark based DNS query filtering. >>> >>> Other mailing lists such as netfilter-de...@vger.kernel.org >>> do not share these DMARC problems. >>> >>> What is the preferred approach here to get my patch reviewed? > > On 17.02.21 22:48, Simon Kelley wrote: >> There's no particular reason for that behaviour, I guess it was the >> default on whichever antediluvian version of mailman was first used to >> host the mailing list. It appears to be trivial to turn both features >> off, and I can't see any particular reason not to. Anyone object? > > I personally prefer mailing lists without munging Subject and bodies. > > however many people seem not to be able to cope with it, since they don't > understand how mailing lists work. > This was apparently readon why those are added. > > The page https://wiki.list.org/DEV/DMARC describes that in order to cope > with DMARC the recommended option is to set > dmarc_moderation_action to "Munge From. > > This solves problem with sites using DMARC without DKIM, because DMARC > in such case requires SPF to match header From:. >
That wiki page is just word-soup as far as I am concerned. Does setting dmarc_moderation_action to "munge from" fix Etan's original problem? Simon. _______________________________________________ Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list Dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk http://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/dnsmasq-discuss
