> On 12 Aug 2021, at 10:06, Simon Kelley <si...@thekelleys.org.uk> wrote: > > This is useful information, but the backtraces are puzzling: the code > isn't in tight loop, certainly. > > > I wonder if the v4only.arpa thing is not a coincidence? > > Some things to try, please. > > 1) When the dnsmasq process is faulted, run > > strace -p <pid of dnsmasq process> > > 2) Try doing a query on ipv4only.arpa to dnsmasq directly, just in case > that's the whole trigger. > > 3) Same but straight to stubby > > dig @127.0.0.1 -p 5453 ipv4only.arpa > > > 4) Take a look in /usr/share/dnsmasq/rfc6761.conf > > Is .arpa mentioned in there?
For reference, the default content is # RFC6761 included configuration file for dnsmasq # # includes a list of domains that should not be forwarded to Internet name servers # to reduce burden on them, asking questions that they won't know the answer to. server=/bind/ server=/invalid/ server=/local/ server=/localhost/ server=/onion/ server=/test/ I wrote it :-) Kevin
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
_______________________________________________ Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list Dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk https://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dnsmasq-discuss
