On Sat, Oct 22, 2022 at 09:26:53PM +0200, Geert Stappers wrote: > Files src/domain-match.c and src/metrics.c had empty last lines. > Now has the last line of those files more than just white space. > > Signed-of-by: Geert Stappers <stapp...@stappers.nl> > --- > src/domain-match.c | 1 - > src/metrics.c | 1 - > 2 files changed, 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/src/domain-match.c b/src/domain-match.c > index 76a1109..219331c 100644 > --- a/src/domain-match.c > +++ b/src/domain-match.c > @@ -729,4 +729,3 @@ int add_update_server(int flags, > > return 1; > } > - > diff --git a/src/metrics.c b/src/metrics.c > index f3e6728..139ad4a 100644 > --- a/src/metrics.c > +++ b/src/metrics.c > @@ -63,4 +63,3 @@ void clear_metrics(void) > serv->query_latency = 0; > } > } > - > -- > 2.11.0 >
The thing I aiming for is "formatting by machine". So that tooling can enforce Coding Style. Reason for raising this issue again, is seeing in a short time: https://www.reddit.com/r/rust/comments/y935fn/comment/it3tvum/?utm_source=reddit&utm_medium=web2x&context=3 * rustfmt would make the indentation match the semantics. clang-format probably would do the same https://nuttx.apache.org/docs/latest/introduction/inviolables.html#clear-consistent-standardized-coding-style * Strict conformance to the NuttX coding style. No “revolutionary” changes to the coding standard (but perhaps some “evolutionary” changes). * Personal or organizational preference is not a justification for a coding style change. * Nothing can come into NuttX that does not follow the coding standard. * Expediency is not a justification for violating the coding standard. Groeten Geert Stappers -- Silence is hard to parse _______________________________________________ Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list Dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk https://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dnsmasq-discuss
