Hello everyone.

I have attended IPv6 seminar yesterday (it was IPv6 day they said), where I have asked how to make similar registration of IPv6 address obtained by SLAAC with hostname of a client. They have said there Android is serious about not supporting DHCPv6 and that is not going to change except for Prefix Delegation.

Anyway, I have claimed on Fedora list [1] that the user friendly way to type IPv6 address is to type a name instead. Which is the best feature of dnsmasq I think, it provides DHCP clients registration in the dns out-of-the-box. Problem is SLAAC do not have any DHCP transaction, where they will tell us their name. So what works nicely on IPv4 networks, it does not on IPv6-only network. Or at least usually.

I thought whether a client on trusted network should try to use DNS UPDATE message  [2] on servers configured. Especially if the dns server is on the same network as the client, that might allow to "register" its name temporarily. If the client used domain sent over router advertisement message, would it be good idea to insert a limited time record just like for DHCP? Since there is no strong authentication in DHCP either, maybe we could accept update coming from the IP used in the record. And create also PTR record for it.

Is there any better way, how to provide more friendly names for IPv6 devices? Sometime we want privacy instead, but that is not needed in trusted network like our own network. Apple devices use Multicast DNS to announce themselves anyway. Since IPv6 addresses are longer, they should have name resolution working by default. But they don't.

Do you know any best practice, how something similar is solved by other vendors? How should that be improved?

Cheers,
Petr

1. https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/Y4FBSNAO2NRWB3YAY6YWE5767ORZRSOY/
2. https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc2136

--
Petr Menšík
Software Engineer, RHEL
Red Hat, http://www.redhat.com/
PGP: DFCF908DB7C87E8E529925BC4931CA5B6C9FC5CB


_______________________________________________
Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dnsmasq-discuss

Reply via email to