What Christian suggests and the fix is not a protocol or IETF type operational issue, but a deployment decision operators and users will have to make. /jim On Thu, 18 Jan 2001, Bill Manning wrote: > % Randy also asked, what happens if an IPv6 only DNS resolver tries to get > % information about an IPv4 domain. The obvious answer is to use a dual > % mode server as proxy. However, this requires some configuration, which > % Ngtrans should automatize. Now, that would would be a work item for this > % group... > % > % -- Christian Huitema > > Perhaps. If this is a protocol issue, then I concur. > --bill >
- Re: (ngtrans) Re: IPv6 dns Brian E Carpenter
- Re: (ngtrans) Re: IPv6 dns itojun
- Re: (ngtrans) Re: IPv6 dns Matt Crawford
- Re: (ngtrans) Re: IPv6 dns Jim Bound
- Re: (ngtrans) Re: IPv6 dns Randy Bush
- Re: (ngtrans) Re: IPv6 dns Jim Bound
- Re: (ngtrans) Re: IPv6 dns Perry E. Metzger
- Re: (ngtrans) Re: IPv6 dns Jim Bound
- Re: (ngtrans) Re: IPv6 dns Robert Elz
- Re: (ngtrans) Re: IPv6 dns Bill Manning
- Re: (ngtrans) Re: IPv6 dns Jim Bound
- Re: (ngtrans) Re: IPv6 dns Matt Crawford
- RE: (ngtrans) Re: IPv6 dns Jim . Bound
- RE: (ngtrans) Re: IPv6 dns Christian Huitema
- RE: (ngtrans) Re: IPv6 dns Randy Bush
- Re: (ngtrans) Re: IPv6 dns Perry E. Metzger
- Re: (ngtrans) Re: IPv6 dns Joseph T. Klein
- RE: (ngtrans) Re: IPv6 dns Christian Huitema
- RE: (ngtrans) Re: IPv6 dns Larson, Matt
- Re: (ngtrans) Re: IPv6 dns Bill Manning
- RE: (ngtrans) Re: IPv6 dns Jim . Bound
