On Wed, 7 Feb 2001, Robert Elz wrote: > Yes, could do, but the problems I mostly see wouldn't be caught by > the simple tests often, so I'm not sure there is a lot of benefit to > them (I don't think I have ever seen anyone here attempting to use > "localhost" in there - though I have seen "" (.) which seems to be > an idea from somewhere on how to avoid spam, and of course the > consequences of $ORIGIN being appended to a FQDN). localhost is not uncommon. The most common error is probably "[EMAIL PROTECTED]", which cannot be caught by anything else but a complete test. Mats ----------------------------------------------------------------- Mats Dufberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] NIC-SE +46-8-545 857 06 Box 5774 fax: +46-8-545 857 29 SE-114 87 Stockholm http://www.nic-se.se/
- Bogus nic.fr behavior D. J. Bernstein
- Re: Bogus nic.fr behavior M�ns Nilsson
- Re: Bogus nic.fr behavior Mark . Andrews
- Re: Bogus nic.fr behavior Mats Dufberg
- Re: Bogus nic.fr behavior Robert Elz
- Re: Bogus nic.fr behavior Mats Dufberg
- Re: Bogus nic.fr behavior Robert Elz
- Re: Bogus nic.fr behavior Mats Dufberg
- Re: Bogus nic.fr behavior Robert Elz
- Re: Bogus nic.fr behavior Mats Dufberg
- Re: Bogus nic.fr behavior Matti Saarinen
- Re: Bogus nic.fr behavior Robert Elz
- Re: Bogus nic.fr behavior Mark . Andrews
- Re: Bogus nic.fr behavior Nathan Jones
- Re: Bogus nic.fr behavior Robert Elz
- Re: Bogus nic.fr behavior D. J. Bernstein
- Re: Bogus nic.fr behavior Bill Manning
- Re: Bogus nic.fr behavior Mark . Andrews
- Re: Bogus nic.fr behavior Bill Manning
- Re: Bogus nic.fr behavior Randy Bush
