Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2001 18:16:23 -0500
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Daniel Senie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: draft-ietf-dnsop-inaddr-required-01.txt
This updated draft has hit the repository. I captured comments from
Pittsburgh and from the mailing list for the most part, but may well
have missed some of each. Please read and comment.
Dan
--
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Daniel Senie [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Amaranth Networks Inc. http://www.amaranth.com
I looked it over earlier today. I came away with some confusion
about the usage of "SHOULD", "must", and "required" throughout
the draft. Is the intent to constrain configurations as with a
requirement such that the "SHOULD"s could be rewritten as "MUST"s?
Or, is the goal to publish as a BCP, where the "must"s could be
rewritten as "it is recommended that" or something similar? I'd
have a better idea of how to read the draft if you could clarify
this point. Thanks.
Steve Mattson
University of Michigan
