> Agreed. But it's the leaves I'm interested in, since the TLD zones are > predictably dull: just NS and A records. your prediction is not supported by reality. i know a lot of cctlds that hold the full data in zone files many megabytes long. randy
- RR distribution by type? Larson, Matt
- RE: RR distribution by type? Brian W. Spolarich
- Re: RR distribution by type? Edward Lewis
- Re: RR distribution by type? Peter Koch
- RE: RR distribution by type? Larson, Matt
- RE: RR distribution by type? Edward Lewis
- Re: RR distribution by type? Randy Bush
- Re: RR distribution by type? Mans Nilsson
- RE: RR distribution by type? Mats Dufberg
