On Mon, 3 Sep 2001, Daniel Senie wrote:
> I'd like to get a sense of whether the WG wants me to continue this
> document under the auspices of the group, or take it back to individual
> contribution status, where it started.
I support this draft and think that is important. however, if possible,
I'd like to see it discussing both IPv4 and IPv6 reverse.
jakob
- draft-ietf-dnsop-inaddr-required-02.txt Daniel Senie
- Re: draft-ietf-dnsop-inaddr-required-02.txt Jakob Schlyter
- Re: draft-ietf-dnsop-inaddr-required-02.txt Edward Lewis
- Re: draft-ietf-dnsop-inaddr-required-02.txt Johan Ihren
- Re: draft-ietf-dnsop-inaddr-required-02.txt Kevin Darcy
- Re: draft-ietf-dnsop-inaddr-required-02.txt Daniel Senie
