>>>>> On Mon, 03 Dec 2001 05:31:39 -0800,
>>>>> Randy Bush <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> agreed. but the pain is minimal. note that, initially, the content of
> ip6.arpa is directly that of ip6.int. in fact, one could have the same
> zone file pointed to by both names. the big pain in the transition is
> that of the registries, whois, etc. and they've been working on this
> for some months.
As for the registry side transition, I have another question. I saw
delegations for 2001:0200::/24 to APNIC. What is the current status
about 3ffe::/16? Is there a plan to delegate ip6.arpa. sub domains
for that block?
JINMEI, Tatuya
Communication Platform Lab.
Corporate R&D Center, Toshiba Corp.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
