On Wed, 23 Jan 2002, R�gis Desmeules wrote: > >I did intend the general principles stated in the document to be > >applicable to both IPv4 and IPv6. But as I'm not an expert in IPv6, > > It's another good point, for many people IPv6 is a new protocol > meaning other basic topics like representations of IPv6 addresses > should be also considered.
I don't myself think that this is the right place to go into detail like that. Representations of IPv6 addresses are applicable in many situations, and ought to be covered independently in a more "obvious" place. IMHO, of course. > If you're interested, I can write as co-author with you the IPv6 > considerations part of the proposed draft. I will wait a few more days to see if further comments come in, and then I will update my draft to include Itojun's suggested points, and then publish a new draft for everybody to consider. Philip -- Philip Hazel University of Cambridge Computing Service, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cambridge, England. Phone: +44 1223 334714.
