Bruce Campbell wrote: >urm, Randy is complaining about dynamic IP addresses from Hosts *outside* >his administrative control. The problem is not with the psg end, but with >the sites that are referencing psg in some-to-be-determined manner. > >If everyone did use a good naming schemes, we'd be happy. If we, as >nameserver operators who get unwanted dynamic updates, were able to point >people at some sort of naming standard and say 'Fix it', we'd be happier. > >The classic example of organisations making up their own standards and not >referencing others, is Microsoft's suggestion of 'Use "INT" for your >Internal naming structures'. The nameservers for 'int.' thus get a nice >loading of dynamic updates. > >Regards, > Sorry, didnt figure that Randy *is* looking after psg. As you say, my finger should be pointing at "some other guy" using psg in their domain, or borrowing psg's address range.
What I'd proposed in a draft was to reserve "pri." for internal networks, and then the "int." servers get a break, and everyones happy as we never have "pri." nameservers. Anyway, I'll let you get back to the original discussion! cheers Simon Coffey _________________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
