so far i can think of a few items for the agenda o status of dnssec, as usual
o opt-in
o i propose that dnsext should be closed. it is demonstrating why we
don't like eternal wgs, drift, fishing expeditions, gnurr attraction,
...
likely process:
o restrict it to finishing current rev of dnssec
o throw out all other items
o anything new should be new wgs, with narrow charters, and have to go
through normal examination
o v4/v6 dns interoperation, see message of a few minutes ago
others?
randy
